September 26, 2016

 

Sex and Lies Democrat Style

 

 

Last week Hillary Clinton came out with an ad claiming Trump wasn't good for your daughters. In response to this the Trump campaign leaked Donald would be bringing Jennifer Flowers, Juanita Broderick, and a host of other women Bill Clinton has been accused of sexually harassing or assaulted over the past few decades.  

 

Early on in the campaign when the Clintons tried this tactic against the Donald, Trump called into question all the women Bill had affairs with in order to educate young Millennials who didn't know the shady past and long list of women Bill has been accuse of abusing. Furthermore they didn't know how active Hillary's role was in hushing up and trashing the women who accused Bill of sexual harassment and worse.e Team Clinton immediately stopped that line of attack on Trump. 

 

I guess team Clinton either has a case of amnesia or they thought with the new Trump personality makeover team Trump would say and do nothing. One of the reasons many on the Right liked Trump is because he fought back and fought hard. I disagreed with the tactic believing there are much better more subtle ways of fighting back without looking like an orange bully, but Trumpist are so spitting mad they didn't care, for them the roll over Right had to be defeated.  

 

It looks like subtly works too, just the mere reminder to team Clinton about using the woman card was going to backfire on team Clinton may be enough, time will tell. 

 

I didn't know about Hillary's server. 

 

I know Hillary has been the one tagged with being a congenital liar, but she is second to Barak Obama. When Hillary's private server was discovered President Obama was asked if he knew about it? President Obama said he had only learned about the server through the news, like everyone else. 

 

In a recent Friday dump by the State Department and FBI, it turns out, our illustrious liar in chief had been in email communications with Hillary using a pseudonym. And the press is a wall. Imagine for a moment if George W. Bush, Paul Ryan, or Donald Trump had created an alternative reality, does anyone believe the press wouldn't be all over the story? However, along with being lap dogs for Obama they don't want to be accused of racism. After all, one need only question Obama and you are tagged a racist. Since the press has been willing accomplices in this charade they must play along. The end result, we the people, or at least the majority of the people never know the truth about Obama. 

 

Back in July when the FBI cleared Hillary of criminal charges I said the reason was because it wasn't going to just bring down Hillary it was going to take down Obama too. Comey was going to be labeled a prior no matter what he did, but if he didn't want the weight of both parties on him, he chose the lesser of the two evils, for himself. 

 

Watergate is nothing compared to this outrageous lawless misconduct, but I am sure the Clinton's made it clear to the Obama's if I go down, you go down and Comey, being the coward he is, didn't want to be the guy who brought down the Democrat President and the Democrat nominee.  

 

It might be nice if the Donald wins he declassifies these documents and makes sure they get into the headlines, but I won't hold my breath. One of the big myths this election cycle has spread is how brave Trump has been, daring the status quo and blah, blah, blah. 

 

Back in April 2016 Ben Shapiro used facts to demonstrate Donald Trump is NOT politically incorrect.  Trump was vulgar, but from men peeing next to little girls to claiming Planned Parenthood does a lot of good things is politically correct. How Trump got labeled politically incorrect was a misunderstanding made by some of the most conservative people on talk radio, or so they claimed to be. Trump was vulgar and an idiot, which was mistakenly labeled politically incorrect, but I digress. 

 

The history books will no doubt correct the record, not much good this does America now and even if it does correct the books, will anyone care? Will America be the shining city on a hill Ronald Reagan envisioned us to be, or we will be a country like Belgium or Norway? I dor one, am pessimistic about the future for America's greatness. 

September 25, 2016

I haven't been able to blog now for some weeks due to a medical emergency I had. I amhttp://www.nationalreview.com/corner on the mend, but my recovery will take some months, God willing. I have missed being able to share my thoughts about the events happening in America and around the world, so without further ado... 

 

An issue which has been bothering me for some time is the coercion by those on the Left about marriage, abortion, euthanasia, and other such moral and ethical issues to those of us who believe in God. 

 

Let's not forget the Left are the tolerant ones among us, at least that is what they keep telling us and unfortunately there are enough people who no longer think for themselves so they believe this fiction. 

 

 

Recently two internationally well known bioethicists wayed in on moral issues pertaining to medical professionals not willing to murder their patients. The bioethicists made this claim, Doctors Have No Right to Refuse Medical Assistance in Dying, Abortion or Contraception:” 

 

 

So the tolerant among us in society now claim you must murder the unborn or born or find something else to do because you do not belong in medicine. Only people who think they can play God can make such an immoral claim.  

 

Furthermore, now Doctors are nothing more than order takers from society who decides what is legal or not. In Nazi Germany it was legal to murder Jews, dwarfs, or individuals with maladys to which the government proclaimed society be free of. 

 

One of the reasons the world said they would never allow another Nazi Germany wasn't because they murdered Jews, it was the entire philosophy which allowed the immorality to happen. 

 

What do you think these bioethicists think the difference is between them and the Nazi's? They are advocating the killing of anyone who says they want to murder the unborn, born, or anyone else who claims they want to die? Who makes this decision, the individual, the family, the doctor, society? Even worse, do the bioethicists themselves decide who lives or dies? 

 

This is sick thinking and only leads the world down a road where there is no return. Who gives these people the right to decide a person's profession based on their religious convictions 

 

 

Furthermore, medicine is for saving lives not taking them, this turns the purpose of medicine on its head. As Wesley J. Smith says, "This is a proposed tyranny. If these bioethicists’ views prevail, in order to become an MD, you will have to be willing to kill. That would be the end of medicine as a true profession." 
 
Mr. Smith proposes a conscience protection law in order to defend life. I would like to agree with him, however the courts seem to think they are the legislatures not Congress. Until Congress takes their job back from judges and executive actions I don't see how we remain a Constitutional Republic. The reason congressman are elected every 2 years is to keep them close to representing the peoples of their district. In other words, to keep legislatures doing the peoples bidding or explain him or herself. Congress has chose not to do their constitutional duty over the past 8 years, they have allowed the courts and executive branches to bypass the people and impose their ideology over the will of the people makes it hard to claim we are a constitutional republic.

August 24, 2016

Non violent Homicide - Progressive style

 

 

A crack dealer who was freed early under the Obama -non-violent criminal get out of jail card, murdered a woman and her 2 kids.

 

The press didn't seem interested in the details of these heinous murders.  Probably because the details, discovered by Judicial Watch, revealed the murderer was an early release from prison by the Obama administration.  Also revealing is crack dealing is non violent criminal activity. Libertarians believe this too so this mental disorder isn't isolated to one side.

 

A convicted crack dealer who left prison early as part of the Obama administration’s mass release of federal inmates has been indicted by a grand jury for fatally stabbing his ex-girlfriend and her two kids in Columbus, Ohio. The gory crime drew national attention because the children, ages 7 and 10, were murdered to eliminate them as witnesses in the brutal massacre of their 32-year-old mother.

 

This week a grand jury in Franklin County returned a 10-count, death-penalty indictment against the ex-con, 35-year-old Wendell Callahan, for the triple murders. Callahan broke into his ex-girlfriend’s apartment and stabbed the three victims, according to a statement issued by Franklin County Prosecutor Ron O’Brien announcing the indictment. The bloody crime scene was discovered by the woman’s current boyfriend, who subsequently engaged in a fight with Callahan before he fled. The indictment includes charges of aggravated murder with prior calculation and design and aggravated murder of victims under the age of 13. “There are multiple charges regarding the three victim deaths because there are different methods to commit the crime of murder and the Prosecutor’s Office typically charges all methods”, O’Brien stated. Callahan is in jail on $3 million bail and is scheduled to be arraigned later this week.

So let's play the switch game, if this were a Republican administration would this have been front page news?

 

For sale to the highest bidder- America

 

Thanks to Judicial Watch we know about the 15,000 additional emails Hillary had originally deleted from her server and were now turned over to the State Department. The DOS (Department of State) is going to begin releasing these emails to the public in...October. Obviously the State Department believes Hillary is going to get elected too and they know where their bread is buttered. If Hillary is elected we will never see those emails.

 

This AP, no conservative "news agency" reported yesterday, At least 85 of 154 people from private interests who met or had phone conversations scheduled with Clinton while she led the State Department donated to her family charity or pledged commitments to its international programs, according to a review of State Department calendars released so far to The Associated Press. Combined, the 85 donors contributed as much as $156 million. At least 40 donated more than $100,000 each, and 20 gave more than $1 million.

I realize voting for Trump poses moral questions because he sprinkled money around Washington for the same type of access and influence as these people did.  Also because he's  a loose cannon and doesn't think before he tweets.  He says vulgar things and spreads lies and conspiracies.

 

One of the biggest problems voting for Trump is what a wild card he really is. He has never held elected office and therefore the American people have no idea whether or not this man is a nut job or not. They know the Clinton's are corrupt and will sell everything in the White House not nailed down, those things nailed down they will rent.

 

However, the biggest moral question has to be your vote for Hillary. Ask yourselves, who was the person in power here? Who was the one trusted by the American people? Who put a $32 million price tag on access to her and our country? This was Hillary Clinton who is now rich because she sold government access to her and the government. Does anyone believe favors weren't done?

 

Hillary has gotten away with many crimes, like a private email server and all the evidence on the server. These new emails turned over to the DOS were deleted by Clinton, I thought she only deleted yoga lessons and wedding plans?! How many lies have we been sold?

 

Hillary is probably going to win the White House and when she does she will be able to get away with anything, she'll just blame it on vagina envy.

 

America used to be a shining city on a hill, now it's as corrupt and bankrupt as Brazil. America is on a fast track alright, to Venezuela style government. A place where people are killing horses for food.

 

I'd like to blame the press for its corrupt participation in the ruining of America Progressive style, but the truth is out there if you want to know it, but the American people don't. They will be satisfied so long as no one takes their smart phones away. I hope so, because it may be all they get to keep in the end.

August 22, 2016

Jerry L Washtington wants to know where Black Lives Matter and the Black Panther's are in Louisiana.

August 21, 2016

Check this girl out she can throw 100 punches in 60 seconds!

Does she have any power? Check out what she does to this tree.

August 19, 2016

State by State levels of Freedom

A State by state chart of freedoms by on the CATO Institute's measures. CATO is a Libertarian think tank and therefore uses marijuana, same-sex marriage, and prison sentencing for drugs,  as well as other sentencing factors for measuring freedom may not coincide with traditionally minded people as measures of rights and "freedoms," however regulations, on housing, zoning, and taxes are all Conservative leaning therefore the level of freedoms may slightly vary when asking different groups, but that is to be expected.

 

The map and indexes are interactive; click on the state map for quick measure indicators while using the index for a more in-depth explanation for measuring freedoms.

 

It's interesting New Hampshire has lost some of its freedom, still while remaining the most free state. In  2007 the state began handing the state over to Democrats in top spots and, according to CATO has lost some of its freedoms. What is interesting is CATO marks the state high for lack of mandatory prison sentencing and low rates of imprisonment for drug violations and yet the state suffers from high addiction rates to drugs, a real problem in the state. Something Libertarians don't see as a problem. They equate intoxication and addiction as a personal freedom and a victimless non-violent crime. Maybe from a far, but I'll bet living with an addict is a nightmare.

 

Overall, since you can click on the index and read the liberty factors CATO uses yourself overall it's a good way of seeing if you would like living in the state better than the one your in.  

August 18, 2016

In 1996, the late great, William Safire wrote about Hillary Clinton and her lying -calling her "a congenital liar." I am reprinting his column in full because it is this essay which will be a small demonstration of what it was like in the 1990's when Bill and Hill were in the White House.

 

What has changed is the F.B.I. and DOJ no longer represent the people, but have become a  branch of the White House political machine.

 

Barak Obama's corruption of every branch of government over the last 8 years has paved the way for the most corrupt person in American politics to ever run for the Presidency in US history.

 

 Since we know the press is nothing more than a branch of the Democrat party there will be no one left to fight for the people and America if she is elected. America will be sold to the highest bidders to the Clinton Foundation.  

 

 

January 8, 1996

 

Essay;Blizzard of

Lies

By WILLIAM SAFIRE

Americans of all political persuasions are coming to the sad realization that our First Lady -- a woman of undoubted talents who was a role model for many in her generation -- is a congenital liar.

Drip by drip, like Whitewater torture, the case is being made that she is compelled to mislead, and to ensnare her subordinates and friends in a web of deceit.

1. Remember the story she told about studying The Wall Street Journal to explain her 10,000 percent profit in 1979 commodity trading? We now know that was a lie told to turn aside accusations that as the Governor's wife she profited corruptly, her account being run by a lawyer for state poultry interests through a disreputable broker.

She lied for good reason: To admit otherwise would be to confess taking, and paying taxes on, what some think amounted to a $100,000 bribe.

2. The abuse of Presidential power known as Travelgate elicited another series of lies. She induced a White House lawyer to assert flatly to investigators that Mrs. Clinton did not order the firing of White House travel aides, who were then harassed by the F.B.I. and Justice Department to justify patronage replacement by Mrs. Clinton's cronies.

Now we know, from a memo long concealed from investigators, that there would be "hell to pay" if the furious First Lady's desires were scorned. The career of the lawyer who transmitted Hillary's lie to authorities is now in jeopardy. Again, she lied with good reason: to avoid being identified as a vindictive political power player who used the F.B.I. to ruin the lives of people standing in the way of juicy patronage.

3. In the aftermath of the apparent suicide of her former partner and closest confidant, White House Deputy Counsel Vincent Foster, she ordered the overturn of an agreement to allow the Justice Department to examine the files in the dead man's office. Her closest friends and aides, under oath, have been blatantly disremembering this likely obstruction of justice, and may have to pay for supporting Hillary's lie with jail terms.

Again, the lying was not irrational. Investigators believe that damning records from the Rose Law Firm, wrongfully kept in Vincent Foster's White House office, were spirited out in the dead of night and hidden from the law for two years -- in Hillary's closet, in Web Hubbell's basement before his felony conviction, in the President's secretary's personal files -- before some were forced out last week.

Why the White House concealment? For good reason: The records show Hillary Clinton was lying when she denied actively representing a criminal enterprise known as the Madison S.& L., and indicate she may have conspired with Web Hubbell's father-in-law to make a sham land deal that cost taxpayers $3 million.

Why the belated release of some of the incriminating evidence? Not because it mysteriously turned up in offices previously searched. Certainly not because Hillary Clinton and her new hang-tough White House counsel want to respond fully to lawful subpoenas.

One reason for the Friday-night dribble of evidence from the White House is the discovery by the F.B.I. of copies of some of those records elsewhere. When Clinton witnesses are asked about specific items in "lost" records -- which investigators have -- the White House "finds" its copy and releases it. By concealing the Madison billing records two days beyond the statute of limitations, Hillary evaded a civil suit by bamboozled bank regulators.

Another reason for recent revelations is the imminent turning of former aides and partners of Hillary against her; they were willing to cover her lying when it advanced their careers, but are inclined to listen to their own lawyers when faced with perjury indictments.

Therefore, ask not "Why didn't she just come clean at the beginning?" She had good reasons to lie; she is in the longtime habit of lying; and she has never been called to account for lying herself or in suborning lying in her aides and friends.

No wonder the President is fearful of holding a prime-time press conference. Having been separately deposed by the independent counsel at least twice, the President and First Lady would be well advised to retain separate defense counsel.

 

August 17, 2016

Wow, Donald Trump delivers a good speech last night on law and order.

 

This makes two good speeches for the Donald. It is a minor miracle and a testament to how desperate we've become for a grown up running on the other side of the aisle.

He attacked Hillary and Obama, even though not by name. This will enrage Obama and he won't be able to resist striking back. We will see.

In the end, this is the type of speech he needs to deliver and it's the speech his supporters deserve.

Let's enjoy this moment because it may not last.  

At least Maggie Hassan is trying to stay honest, but for those who look down on people supporting Donald Trump they need to take a good long look in the mirror.

 

Hillary Clinton is not only dishonest she WILL sell America's security to the highest bidder. Her and Bill have proven this time and again.

 

If you support Hillary you have to admit it is a crap sandwich.

August 16, 2016

Quote of the Day...

 

Racism oppresses its victims, but also binds the oppressors, who sear their consciences with more and more lies until they become prisoners of those lies. They cannot face the truth of human equality because it reveals the horror of the injustices they commit. Alveda King.

 

Victor Davis Hanson in -Today, it seems that Orwell’s 1984 would better have been titled 2016.
 

Hanson talks about the reversal of logic we have gone through with safe spaces, speech codes, and the new thought police. The Left used to fight to for right to say unpopular and even outrageous things today they need to be coddled like children against things they deem offensive. The Left have now become the intolerant and regressive party and it's not just wrong it's now dangerous.

 

The biggest regression has been the war on white and the race riots the Left now engages in. They've moved from intolerant speech to dangerous and deadly behavior.
 

"Emblematic of the current racial nihilism was the recent fatal shooting in Milwaukee of an African-American suspect at a traffic stop (who was armed with a stolen automatic weapon, and who had 13 prior arrests) by an African-American police officer (in a city whose sheriff is African-Americans) — leading to looting and mini-riots, in which whites were targeted by their race. “Poor” people, who said they were deprived, coordinated their looting and rioting on expensive smart phones and cool social media. Immediately prior to the shooting, several African-Americans were shot by other African-Americans — without commensurate violence or even much news coverage."

 

Time and again we are reminded by our betters on the Left how much more moral and caring they are of the poor and how white America is racist in their DNA, yet whose polices throughout the decades have destroyed black communities? The financial crisis of 2008 left an opening for the Marxist Left to finally implement their solutions used in the urban and minority communities on the rest of America and the results are a stagnant economy which is limping along at 1%. Job growth hobbles around 275,000 - 300,000 month to month. The non participation numbers are the highest they've been since the 70's and ones hit hardest on the poorest of communities.

 

Rather than allow the black communities to reassess their current situation and analyze the black guy in the white house whose done this to them Obama and the Left have decided to create a race war. The latest focus now falls on Milwaukee where "the war on cops, ideological and sometimes lethal, may be expanding into a broader race war, in which only one side fights. The thugs who torched businesses and police cars, assaulted cops, and shot at firemen in northwestern Milwaukee on Saturday night went after “white bitches,” among other targets. (The riots were inspired by the fatal police shooting of Sylville K. Smith, a black man. Smith, who had an extensive arrest record, including for a shooting, fled from officers after a traffic stop while carrying a stolen handgun; he refused commands to drop the gun. Wisconsin governor Scott Walker has activated the state’s National Guard and declared a state of emergency, but violence continued into Sunday night, with four officers injured, three squad cars damaged, and multiple businesses burned down.) The Black Lives Matter-inspired assassin who murdered five police officers in Dallas in July 2016 said that he wanted to kill white people, as well as white cops. The vitriol that officers working in urban areas now encounter on a daily basis is inflected with racism."   

 

Barak Obama's policies have been destructive to urban black communities, but since they haven't been able to get the extra 5 million votes by executive decree' with Hispanics the Left will keep up the race war they started a few years ago.

I will conclude with Heather MacDonald's devastating analysis:

 

The Milwaukee riots were low on the topic totem pole of Sunday morning talk shows and have almost disappeared from sight on cable news channels on Monday. Racial violence is becoming normalized, like Islamic terrorism. More attention was devoted to the Baltimore Justice Department report and to Donald Trump’s war on the press than to the breakout of anarchy in a major American city. The shootings of cops on Sunday—a police officer in Eastman, Georgia, killed following a traffic stop; a police officer north of Atlanta shot on Sunday morning after responding to a call—also got little media notice. (Did race play a role in those shootings? The media is not interested in the question. Thesuspected killer of Eastman officer Tim Smith, Royheem Delshawn Deeds, is black; Smith was white. Had Smith killed Deeds, the media would have been all over the story. Yet the relationship between victim and killer in the Smith death is far more typical of fatal encounters between blacks and police officers. Police officers are 18.5 times more likely to be killed by a black male than an unarmed black male is to be killed by a police officer.) Fatal shootings of cops this year are up 68 percent through August 15 compared with the same period last year. Chicago cops now operate under a death sentence, with the pact among Chicago gangbangers to take out a cop in retaliation for the Paul O’Neal shooting.

 

 

If we continue to look the other way at racial violence and the hatred that fuels it, we may find ourselves in a state of anarchy. The Milwaukee rioters chanted “black power,” a clear evocation of the 1960s. This time, however, the “establishment” is only a rhetorical target. In point of fact, it is an enabler and coconspirator.

 

August 12, 2016

More Media thumb tipping on the scales of elections

 

Search the web as hard as you might, but you won't find the story about a Joint Congressional task force finding which concludes:

 

the JTF found that intelligence products approved by senior CENTCOM leaders typically provided a more positive depiction of U.S. anti-terrorism efforts than was warranted by facts on the ground and were consistently more positive than analysis produced by other elements of the Intelligence Community. It further determined that numerous process changes implemented at CENCTOM as well as leadership deficiencies resulted in widespread dissatisfaction among CENTCOM analysts who felt their superiors were distorting their products. 

 

furthermore, Rep. Calvert said, “The leadership failures at CENTCOM reach to the very top of the organization."

 

When the New York Times claims "all the news that fit to print." What they really mean is all the news they see fit to print.

 

The next documentary Dinesh D'Souza produces should be on the media who has time and again weighed in on stories in order to help the Democrats advance their side and tip elections, falsely make allegations about Republicans, or just not telling the American people what actually is taking place.

 

The media has been falsely altering stories for decades, however since the advent of Rush Limbaugh and Fox News the media has become a walking talking cheerleader, advocate, and liar for the Democrat party a disturbing fact which will destroy all trust once the extent is none.

 

Remember Bill Whittles video "The Narrative" where he recalls the line from the movie Serenity in which the signal eventually gets out and the truth is none. It is beginning to happen and when the truth eventually gets out the altering of history will begin its reckoning the Democrat party will be destroyed.

The Media is the real story

 

Some of these clips you can argue the video feed cut out, however the clips where the anchor argues the information is false or "hasn't been confirmed on this network" when it clearly was by multiple sources is troubling.

 

The media has been caught in multiple scenarios sticking their thumb on the scale of weak Democrats in order to help carry them over the finish line time and again.

 

We saw it with Dan Rather when he and his producer put out false documents about George W. Bush.

 

We have seen the NY Times put on their front page 33 days in a row a story about Abu Grab prison in order to paint an ugly picture of George W. Bush and the war in Iraq, including tainting all the military with the actions of a few in a negative light. A story which our own military was the one who pressed charges therefore the volume of media attention was clearly meant to besmirch not add information. These stories also  include, falsely claiming a reported story of U.S. military personnel flushing Korans down toilets in Guantanamo.

 

We saw Candy Crowley off CNN in 2011 falsely state Mitt Romney was wrong about information which showed Barak Obama weak and lying about Benghazi in a presidential debate in the election of 2012. Crowley went as far as to call Romney the liar when clearly it was the President himself who was lying to the American people.

 

Barak Obama lies to the American people on a daily basis, yet time and again the media either doesn't report it or plays the story for a day or two and then moves on so the public never gets the full scope of what is taking place. When surrogates remind the American people of Obama or his administrations lies the media claims the story is old and its time to move on.

 

The video below is a snap shot, a window, into the day of a conservative or a Republican trying to break through the media onslaught of lies or misleads they continue to take the American people through.

 

The fact is Donald Trump would not be the nominee today if Republicans didn't believe a demagogue of their own was the only way to break the media and get a Republican elected.

h/t:ihatethemedia

Ausgust 10, 2016

If you are a reader of this blog you know I am not a Donald Trump fan, but anyone who is shocked by this report wasn't paying attention.

 

The media is out to destroy Trump, why do you think they gave him all the positive media? They knew he was the only one Hillary could actually defeat.

August 9, 2016

The Blood Libels of modernity

 

The Olympics were always supposed to be a place where countries, no matter their standing in the world, could send their best athletes to compete among other countries to determine the best at their skill.

 

Who can't look back with pride to the 1936 summer Olympics where a young man named, Jessie Owens from the USA, won 4 gold medals in the sprint and long jumps in front of the racist Adolf Hitler. For those who don't know, Jessie Owens was a black man. Rather than not compete Owens proved his superiority with his skills.   

 

The 2016 Rio Olympics has 205 countries competing for medals. Among these countries are some of the world's most vial when it comes to human rights and murder; Syria, Saudi Arabia, N. Korea, Sudan, Russia, China etc., however no one says or does a thing.

 

There is only one country who has been isolated and drawn special ire and that country is Israel. In the Olympics of 1972 two members of the Israeli team were murdered and nine other Israelis were held hostage by 8 Palestinian terrorists who were demanding the release of 200 Palestinian prisoners. They were all slain in a failed rescue attempt.

 

Each Olympic we here the name of countries and their athletes who should be shun from the world stage, however the Olympics are supposed to be politics free. Just one nation, one people are separated and treated with disdain, Israel.

 

It is particularly curios why these athletes hold Israeli athletes personally responsible for what are supposed to be the actions of their government?  For example the Lebanese team refused to allow the Israeli team to share a bus with them. Today a Saudi Arabian judo competitor forfeited her first match because the competitor was  an Israeli.

 

The question the decent world should be asking is why? Why will they get on a bus or roll around the mats with a North Korean or Syrian, but not an Israeli?

 

The answer is more simple than you think, it's called Anti-Semitism. The belief that Jews are something other than human.

 

Salam Amir, a Muslim himself, describes the religious underpinnings and problem of anti-Semitism in the Muslim world this way:

 Robert Wistrich has rightly called Muslim anti-Semites "a clear and present danger."2 He has painstakingly described the characterizations of the Jews by Muslims. Those most forceful in spewing their bigotry against the Jews are Palestinian Arabs and their religious, political and intellectual leaders.3 The role of the Mufti of Jerusalem, Haj Amin al-Husseini, as Hitler's collaborator in importing European anti-Semitism into the Middle East, is well documented.4The Mufti's ideology and politics have never been openly or publicly disavowed by Palestinians, or by religious and political leaders among Arabs or Muslims in general. To the contrary, the Mufti's ideology of hate-mongering against the Jews and the Zionist project has been emulated by an array of other leading Arab and Muslim intellectuals, activists, and religious leaders, including Hasan al-Banna, the founder of the Muslim Brotherhood; Syed Qutb, the intellectual heavyweight of the Muslim Brothers; Sheikh Ahmed Yassin, the founder of Hamas; the rulers, religious leaders and imams of Saudi Arabia; the clerics of al-Azhar, the most renowned and prestigious Sunni Muslim religious institution, in Cairo; Abul A'la Mawdudi, the Indo-Pakistani founder of the Jamaat-i-Islami; Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, the Iranian architect of the Islamic Republic with its current Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and, notably, the former presidents Akbar Rafsanjani and Mahmoud Ahmedinejad; the leaders of Hizbullah in Lebanon; Sheikh Yusuf al-Qaradawi, the popular Egyptian cleric who appears on Al Jazeera; the leadership and ranks of al Qaeda and other "jihadi" (holy war) organizations, such as the Taliban in Afghanistan and Pakistan; and non-clerical or secular Muslim leaders like Mahathir Mohamad, the former prime minister of Malaysia. Clearly, the front of Muslim anti-Semitism is wide and deep.

 

The Western press and elite among them have a word for every made up or long past phobia in the West such as; Islamophobia, homophobia, xenophobia, bigoted, racist, sexist,  and intolerant yet there is no such word as Judeophobia. Why not, of all the provable racist reactions the world can see Jews are singularly held out for special scrutiny, yet there is no such word?  It is curious to say the least.   

 

 

Muslim and European countries teach their people that Israeli-Jews are descendents of apes and pigs. They are told they drink the blood of Muslims and make matzo from the flesh of Muslim children.

 

The Palestinian government, funded by the world community, is a living breathing embodiment of Judeophobia with cartoons depicting Jews of siding with satans to fight Muhammad and the Muslims. Abbas himself engages in libels telling their citizens that Israel is trying to take over the Temple Mount or Rabbi's are poisoning Palestinian drinking water. Their Mullahs teach that Jews lie and distort the truth and that an "aversion to truth flows in their blood." The Arab world teaches young Muslims that the Holocaust never happened and that the Jews made it up. They claim Hitler was a great man and the Jews lied about him.

 

Is it any wonder why these athletes won't ride on a bus or wrestle on a mat with a Jew?! Would you if you believed these things?

 

We have long been approaching the place where the lies become truth and truth become lies. We have watched it happen with Black Lives Matter and Occupy Wall Street. People are treated with child like gloves from the media helping promote hate of white people, police, Wall Street executives, Bankers, and America herself.

 

The Arab and Muslim world have taught Western haters in journalism and politicians the libels of American history and they have been teaching to their own. Barak Obama has claimed Americans have racism is in our DNA. If that isn't a blood libel than there is no such thing as a blood libel.

 

The world has been taught and learned much from the world of hatred and they swim in it. The next time a young black man murders a white person or police officer in cold blood remember it is the teachings of the U.S. government's leader Barak Obama who has told these young men that white Americans and police officers will never treat them fairly and that they are jailed unfairly and held back due to the color of their skin.

 

Is it any wonder why they would kill the people they believe are out to get them? These teachings come from the President of the United States of America himself, wouldn't you believe you were the descent and moral person fighting back against the hatred?

 

When will the decent among us in the world stand up to the libels of the real haters among us?

August 7, 2016

The dishonesty of the media.

 

Anyone who reads this site knows I am not a Donald Trump fan. I believed of all the candidates he was going to be the easiest to caricature due to his style, past, and lack of any substance with respect to foreign and domestic policy. Much of his knowledge on foreign or domestic policy is either wrong, dishonest, or conspiratorial.

 

Many who supported him didn't care if he acted just like a Democrat who are lie or make up facts which don't exist. However, when you are on the Left the media serves only to rubber stamp your views and doesn't question or stay on the story long enough to show the lies perpetuated from the Left.

 

Additionally, they don't devote the time or resources for the Left nearly as much as the Right. Trump's supporters believed Trump would fight back and fight back hard.  It turns out the only people Trump is interested in attacking are Republicans. Granted, they want him to lose, but if Trump wants to transform the Republican party he needs to show Republicans how to do it, he can't expect them to change.

 

What is so striking to me is Trump claims he's the only one who can fix the problems, but then lashes out at Republicans when they act like Republicans.

 

What does that mean? It means when a Republican says something unfeeling, or off putting; such as much of what Trump says, the media run to every leading Republican and ask if they approve of what Donald Trump says? Three quarters of Republicans are scared little rats who have kept their heads low and gone along to get a long much of their political careers, so why is Trump so shocked, after all he's the only one who can fix it all. He's the one who claims their all stupid.

 

He can't expect Ryan, McCain, or McConnell to do anything different than they have done for the past decade, it's who the Republicans are. It's why Mr. Trump the electorate is so mad at them. You turning your guns on them rather than showing them how to defeat the media and this only feeds the existing narrative, that you're nuts!

 

Last week the media reported Donald Trump threw a baby out of one of his rally's. It turns out not to be true. For that matter thegatewaypundit has the entire story from the mother, the video, and witnesses. In a rare moment of journalism the Washington Post fact checked the media and CBS reported on it. The story is here.

 

However, here is a factual story of Mrs. Clinton the media hasn't told about a K9 handler in the military. In order to determine if the media is playing it straight one need only ask if this were about Trump would the media be silent? You decide, here's the story:

 

“I’m not Voting for Clinton.

It has nothing to do with her views. It really doesn’t even matter about all the laws she broke.

It’s because She actually talked to me once. Almost a sentence. But first, some background.

Being a K9 handler in the Military I got to do a few details involving Distinguished Visitors. Mostly Generals, DOD Officials, and Secretaries of Defense. I was lucky enough to pull two awesome details.

George W Bush, and Obama.

GW looked at me, said “Man, who’d you piss off” high fived me, and continued on. I was climbing down from a catwalk I stood on for 4 hours with nothing but Dust and a radio to keep me company. The radio died early on. It was pretty sweet.

Obama, as he was walking out to his plane in Turkey, said “What the hell kind of dog is that?!” In reference to Suli.

One of my Last details was for Hillary when she was Secretary of State. She was in Turkey for whatever reason. I helped with sweeps of her DV Quarters and staff vehicles. Her words to me? “Get that Fucking dog away from me.” Then she turns to her Security Detail and berates them up and down about why that animal was in her quarters. For the next 20 minutes while I sit there waiting to be released she lays into her detail, slamming the door in their faces when she’s done. The Detail lead walks over apologizes and releases me. I apologize to him for getting him in trouble. His words “Happens every day, Brother”

Hillary doesn’t care about anyone but Hillary.”

 

Because I am not a Trump supporter I find myself in an awkward position, an observer and therefore susceptible to the narrative. It is an interesting position to be in after all my years as a solid Republican vote.

 

 

The media is excellent at what they do which is piling on to the narrative. The narrative is Trump is erratic and cannot be trusted with the nuclear button. 

 

 

In the meantime his supporters are out there, against all evidence I might add, claiming it is going to be a Trump landslide.

 

 

While I fail to see this evidence, for their sake, I hope they're right they have a lot invested in this man.

 

Here is display of their confidence in Trump with humor.

 

Media headlines they made up: 

 

"Studies Show Trump Causes Cancer"
"Donald Trump Still A KKK Member"
"Melania Gives Herself Coat Hanger Abortions"
"Trump Owns Secret Suitcase Nuke"
"Poll Shows Clinton In Unbeatable Lead, Forever"
"Trump Sexually Attracted To Hitler"
"Trump Kids Visit Islamist Website"
"GOP Leaders Call Trump ´Fat´"
"The Trump Plan: 1002% Tax On Poor People"
"Girl Hospitalized Because Of Trump Nightmares"
"Report: Clinton Heals The Blind, Lepers, Raises The Dead"

The MSM is preparing next week´s headlines...

August 4, 2016

Dump Trump NOW, THIS WEEK, TODAY before it's too late

 

Here are a few things which are becoming crystal clear. Trump is either incapable of learning, unwilling to learn, or is purposely throwing this election away. If only he'd shut up about himself and talk about Hillary he would waltz into the White House. Republicans wait in vain for the pivot which will never come.

Trump can't understand this isn't about allegiance to him. My goodness this is reminisce of the applause for a dictator. You must clap loud and you must clap often or you're a traitor.

 

The creator of the Trump campaign, Roger Stone; who supposedly no longer works for the Trump campaign, but his partner Paul Manafort is now campaign manager is actively claiming the election is rigged. The point is to get that idea out and get it out often in order to undermine any results, but a Trump victory, no matter how bad the candidate is.

 

 We have heard this mantra from the beginning from team Trump, parroted by FoxNews hosts Bill O'Reilly and Sean Hannity.  This lie is horrific and damaging to our electoral process. 

 

Maybe Bill O'Reilly and Sean Hannity have been promised HUGE contracts for the Trump channel for gathering in and keeping Trump supporters in perpetual fear that their country is so corrupt that even a lying narcissistic demagogue like Trump with his HUGE 42% win of the Republican nomination is being cheated out of the election he is clearly throwing. After all one good conspiracy deserves another.

 

I am tired of hearing people I admire and respect denounce those of us who won't sell their souls for Trump and back a lying demagogue whose behavior is so repugnant that his numbers have dropped by double digits in just one week. You'd think Trump was actively working for Hillary he's so bad, but no this is the guy 42% of Republicans sold their souls to and the rest jumped on board and have taken up the mantle of applauding loud and often or your voting for Hillary. Wake up you're the one blowing the election by offering any support to this land mine.

 

These are not errors he's been making. He's been doing this stuff from the beginning, it's the reason most of the party didn't back him. It's the reason any sane person could see Trump needs to go.

 

To the Republican establishment, I beg you for the sake of the party and the sake of the country dump Trump NOW!

 

If we offered a potted plant to run against Hillary it would have been better. Don't continue down this road, there is preciously little time left to make the most important, but correct decision to cut him loose. Forget the Trumpkins, they will drag you down and then blame you no matter what. Know it and live with it. I believe the election is still winnable with any one of the 16 candidates who ran against Trump. Throw the names in a hat, pick one and run him or her against Hillary or you will lose this election and our souls.

 

The fear Trump engenders among  ordinary American's who are turned off by Hillary's lies and poor judgment are erased when watching Trump's wild erratic behavior on both foreign and domestic issues. It makes pulling the lever for her palatable, if not necessary, to keep him away from the nuclear button.
 

Grow up Reince it's time to put the big pants now and make the right decision for America.

August 2, 2016

Free Market Capitalism vs. Socialism

For the last 100 years the Left has been trying out Socialism in many different forms around the world. It has turned into something ugly and has yet to have a place of success to point toward, and yet, the persistence of this utopian fantasy proceeds on schedule as if history doesn't exist.

The Parable of the 10 men in a bar

 

Suppose that every day, ten men go out for beer and the bill for all ten comes to $100. If they paid their bill the way we pay our taxes,it would go something like this:

The first four men (the poorest) would pay nothing.
The fifth would pay $1.
The sixth would pay $3.
The seventh would pay $7.
The eighth would pay $12.
The ninth would pay $18.
The tenth man (the richest) would pay $59.

So, that’s what they decided to do.

The ten men drank in the bar every day and seemed quite happy with the arrangement, until one day, the owner threw them a curve. ‘Since you are all such good customers,’ he said, ‘I’m going to reduce the cost of your daily beer by $20.’ Drinks for the ten now cost just $80.

The group still wanted to pay their bill the way we pay our taxes so the first four men were unaffected. They would still drink for free.

But what about the other six men – the paying customers? How could they divide the $20 windfall so that everyone would get his ‘fair share?’

They realized that $20 divided by six is $3.33. But if they subtracted that from everybody’s share, then the fifth man and the sixth man would each end up being paid to drink his beer. So, the bar owner suggested that it would be fair to reduce each man’s bill by roughly the same amount, and he proceeded to work out the amounts each should pay.

And so:
The fifth man, like the first four, now paid nothing (100%savings).
The sixth now paid $2 instead of $3 (33%savings).
The seventh now paid $5 instead of $7 (28%savings).
The eighth now paid $9 instead of $12 (25% savings).
The ninth now paid $14 instead of $18 (22% savings).
The tenth now paid $49 instead of $59 (16% savings).

Each of the six was better off than before. And the first four continued to drink for free. But once outside the restaurant, the men began to compare their savings.

‘I only got a dollar out of the $20,’ declared the sixth man. He pointed to the tenth man, ‘but he got $10!’

‘Yeah, that’s right,’ exclaimed the fifth man. ‘I only saved a dollar, too. It’s unfair that he got ten times more than I got!’

‘That’s true!!’ shouted the seventh man. ‘Why should he get $10 back when I got only two? The wealthy get all the breaks!’

‘Wait a minute,’ yelled the first four men in unison. ‘We didn’t get anything at all. The system exploits the poor!’

The nine men surrounded the tenth and beat him up.

The next night the tenth man didn’t show up for drinks so the nine sat down and had beers without him. But when it came time to pay the bill, they discovered something important. They didn’t have enough money between all of them for even half of the bill!

And that, ladies and gentlemen, journalists and college professors, is how our tax system works!!

The people who pay the highest taxes get the most benefit from a tax reduction. Tax them too much, attack them for being wealthy, and they just may not show up anymore. In fact, they might start drinking overseas where the atmosphere is somewhat friendlier.